Friday, August 31, 2012

FOXNews.com: Finding God on the moon

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Finding God on the moon
Aug 31st 2012, 20:04

Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong are famous for this moment in American history –the giant leap in human creativity, engineering, and science. I found myself thinking about Buzz and Neil over the weekend after we learned of Neil Armstrong's passing.  

My generation (I was born in 1979) is virtually incapable of appreciating (even with the help of Wiki and Google and YouTube) the magnitude of Aldrin and Armstrong's courage. You've seen the photos. Some of you have the uncle, the conspiracy theorist, ever ready to tell you that we did not, in fact, ever land on the moon. "It's propaganda!"

A story has emerged out of this watershed moment . . . the story comes directly from Buzz (Aldrin, not Lightyear, I have to remind my 3 year old son, Lucas). I wonder, to myself, if Neil thought about this moment during the final few days of his life. I wonder what these memories meant to him as he drew closer to the great mystery that is our inevitable death.

An elder in a Presbyterian Church in Houston, Aldrin wanted to mark the occasion as a tribute to God, the Creator, and as a blessing for the rest of the world. (You can look this up in Aldrin's book, "Magnificent Desolation".) After consulting his minister, he decided the sacrament of Communion would be the most appropriate. Don't ask me how this worked in zero gravity (one-sixth gravity technically.

During a break in the hoopla and conversation with the rest of the U.S., Aldrin took out the bread and the wine. He received the meal Jesus had instituted two thousand years prior, when no one could have possibly imagined space travel. Aldrin read the words of Jesus, "I am the vine; you are the branches. If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing." (Jn. 15:5) He also read Psalm 8: "You have set your glory in the heavens . . . When I consider the heavens, the words of your fingers, the moon and the stars which you have set in place . . . Who are we that you are mindful of us, human beings that you care for us?"

The first food ever consumed . . . the bread. The first liquid, wine.

In Aldrin's own words:  ". . . It's interesting to think that some of the first words spoken on the moon were the words of Jesus Christ, who made the Earth and the moon — and Who, in the immortal words of Dante, is Himself the 'Love that moves the Sun and other stars.'"

When these sacred moments come to you . . . what do you do? How do you respond?

The birth of a child.

A marriage mended from the snare of divorce.

The relief from immense physical pain.

The call that announces the absence of cancer from your body.

The end of an arduous journey.

The return of a prodigal friend or child.

Good news from a distant country.

The death of a hero, like Armstrong.

Bread and wine, a table, a thankful heart.

Jesus is already present in those moments. The bread and wine remind us, embodying this eternal truth down to the tips of our toes. Or to the edges of the universe.

The Love of God holds all things together. 250,000 miles from home. Aldrin knew that God was all around, in each moment, on the moon, in the bread and in the wine. I like to imagine Neil Armstrong remembering this in his final hour. I like to think all of us might do the same.

Like the prophet Jonah of the Jewish Scriptures, Aldrin and Armstrong learned what he already knew, there's nowhere you can go that God isn't.

So eat and drink and celebrate and dance and laugh and give thanks. Chief Tucumseh famously penned these words, words that fit Armstrong's life and death so well. When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.

Josh Graves is a minister and writer. Visit his website: joshgraves.com or follow him on Twitter: @joshgraves.com. His next book, "Heaven on Earth" with Chris Seidman (Abingdon), comes out in November.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Four years later -- seeking a peaceful end to the Russian occupation

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Four years later -- seeking a peaceful end to the Russian occupation
Aug 31st 2012, 15:07

Four years ago this month, as many around the world were watching the summer Olympics in Beijing, Russia invaded the Republic of Georgia. At one point Russian tanks were on the outskirts of Georgia's capital, Tbilisi. Russian planes dropped bombs on Tbilisi International Airport -- a civilian airport.

Hostilities were quickly brought to an end by a French diplomatic intervention in the form of a Six Point Cease Fire agreement. However, four years later Russia still fails to live up to the requirements of the agreement.

Instead of military might, Georgia is taking a soft-power approach: winning over those living in the occupied territories and showing that a united Georgia is in everyone's interest.

-

Currently, 10,000 Russian troops occupy the two Georgian provinces of South Ossetia and Abkhazia which equal 20 percent of Georgia's internationally recognized territory. Imagine a foreign army occupying one-fifth of the United States -- roughly equivalent to everything west of the Rocky Mountains in the continental U.S.

So what is the Georgian government doing about it?

Georgian leaders, tired of bloodshed and looking for peace, know that there will never be a military solution to ending the Russian occupation. To this end, President Saakashvili has publically made a "non-use of force" pledge regarding the occupied territories -- something that Russia fails to do in return.

Instead of military might, Georgia is taking a soft-power approach: winning over those living in the occupied territories and showing that a united Georgia is in everyone's interest. Through a strategy that is best described as "engagement through cooperation," Georgia's Ministry of Reintegration has implemented several programs designed to pull the two occupied territories slowly out of the Russian orbit and back into Georgia's.

For example, because regional security is derived from economic freedom, there is a drive to promote trade between communities that straddle the line between free Georgia and the occupied regions. Knowing that free trade will foster economic growth in the region, Georgia has also agreed to Russia's membership in the World Trade Organization.

The Georgian Ministry of Education and Science is making it easier for the residents of the occupied regions to earn Georgian college degrees by allowing students to take their required exams in the Ossetian or Abkhaz languages. The government is also funding scholarships for those living in the occupied territories to attend leading universities in Europe and the United States.

But travelling overseas from the occupied territories is no easy feat. In addition to Russia, only Nicaragua, Venezuela, and three tiny Pacific Island countries -- Tuvalu, Vanuatu and Nauru -- recognize the sovereignty and, therefore, the passports issued by the Russian-backed South Ossetian and Abkhazian puppet governments.

To encourage and allow international travel, but without politicizing issue of nationality, Georgia has established Status Neutral Travel Documents. Basically, these are passports that do not state the nationality of the individual. This ensures that innocent locals do not suffer from the regional dispute. So far, these documents are recognized by the U.S., Japan and five Eastern European countries, but it is hoped that more will recognize them in the future.

Georgia has clearly taken the moral high road in its dispute with Russia. One can see why Russia is hesitant to support Georgia's "engagement through cooperation" strategy.

Since President Mikheil Saakashvili peacefully took power in 2003, Georgia has made tremendous improvements in its economy, democracy and international standing -- all in complete contrast to what Russia is experiencing under Putin. Once regularly described as an "ex-Soviet State," Georgia is now better described as a beacon of hope for the future of the region.

Georgia will prove that, as in the Cold War, Russia won't have to be defeated on the battlefield with tanks and soldiers. Moscow's ambitions in the region will be defeated because, quite simply, freedom trumps oppression. In the end, the values, ideas and vision of President Saakashvili, and the modern Georgia he leads, will turn out to be more powerful than any army Georgia could ever field.

Russia cannot keep South Ossetia and Abkhazia isolated forever. Someday those living under the oppressive yoke of Moscow's henchmen in the occupied regions will see that their future is better off with Tbilisi. This will take time, maybe even as long as a generation, but it will happen.

Luke Coffey is The Heritage Foundation's Margaret Thatcher Fellow, specializing in transatlantic security issues.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: The Asian-American dream and the Republican Party

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Asian-American dream and the Republican Party
Aug 31st 2012, 14:23

Senator Rand Paul in his speech to the Republican National Convention Thursday night highlighted the personal stories of Southeast Asian immigrants, including the Taing family from Cambodia and Vietnamese brothers Hung and Thuan Trinh, who risked their lives to sail to America on a boat from Vietnam. He told us about the risk they took to flee their war-torn countries – a risk often unimaginable to many of us born in the United States – to find freedom, peace and opportunity in the country we call home.  

As a second-generation Vietnamese-American, I was proud and encouraged to see Republicans not only praising immigrants who worked hard to build their own success, but calling attention to the often politically-overlooked group of Americans who so embody the American dream and are increasingly important to the future of our country.

Some interesting facts to consider: Asians recently surpassed Hispanics to become the largest group of immigrants to the United States, with Asians approaching 40 percent of immigrants in 2009 while immigrants of Hispanic origin were just over 30 percent. To add to that, the number of Asian-Americans running for Congress this year has more than tripled since 2008.

As the Asian American population continues to grow and become more and more politically engaged we have a huge opportunity – and a huge responsibility – to include Asian Americans into our party that promotes and defends our shared values of family, small business ownership and freedom from big government.

- Michelle Mai Selesky

Republicans take note: As the Asian-American population continues to grow and become more and more politically engaged we have a huge opportunity – and a huge responsibility – to include Asian-Americans into our party that promotes and defends our shared values of family, small business ownership, and freedom from big government.

According to a Pew Research Center study released in June of this year, Asian-Americans place a particularly strong emphasis on family, with 54 percent naming it "one of the most important things in life" compared to 34 percent of all American adults. When it comes to the idea of hard work, Pew reports that 69 percent of Asian-Americans believe "people can get ahead if they are willing to work hard," whereas only 58 percent of all Americans agree.

Most importantly from a values perspective, many Asian-Americans, particularly political refugees, understand the core values that define American exceptionalism. That America is founded on the truth that our rights come from our creator, not from any government, dictator or king.

My mother, who fled Vietnam as Saigon fell in April 1975, knows what it's like when government oversteps its boundaries and freedom no longer exists. She knows what it's like to have to choose to leave your own country, and to choose risking your own life, in the mere hope of finding freedom elsewhere. And she knows that America is the last place on earth for people in the world to run when staying in their own country is no longer an option. 

Republicans and conservatives, who have taken the lead in defending America from the increasingly big-government policies of the left, must include Asian-Americans in our effort to preserve our shared belief in American exceptionalism.

From a pragmatic perspective, there are a few important statistics for Republicans leaders to know:  

1. The population of Asian-Americans grew 46 percent over the last decade – at a rate higher than any other race, according to the 2010 U.S. Census. As the make-up of the United States continues to change in the years and decades to come, Asian-Americans will become an increasingly large percentage of the voting population, looking for political leaders who will best represent their values. It's up to Republicans to include Asian-Americans into our party – as voters and as elected officials – starting today.

2. The number of American businesses owned by people of Asian origin grew more than 40 percent between 2002 and 2007, reaching 1.5 million, and increasing at more than twice the national rate, according to the 2007 Survey of Business Owners: Asian-Owned Businesses. These businesses employed nearly three million people in the United States. President Obama this year has made the choice quite clear. By insulting every American small business owner with his now-infamous "You didn't build that" remarks, the president has thrown the door wide-open for Republicans, as defenders and promoters of small business, to reach out to and engage Asian-American business owners.

3. Thirty Asian-Americans ran for Congress in 2012, which more than tripled the number of Asian-American candidates of 2008, according to the Asian Pacific Institute for Congressional Studies. Twenty-five of these candidates ran as Democrats. To put it simply, Democrats have done a far better job reaching out to Asian-Americans. The GOP must make a concerted effort to include them in the Republican Party if we want to be a national majority for generations to come.

In the past decade there have been several promising signs that conservatives are awakening to the importance of Asian-Americans – not only to the Republican Party but to the future of America. For example, in 2001 U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao became the first Chinese-American to serve in the Cabinet under President George W. Bush, and Republican Joseph Cao was the first Vietnamese-American to serve in Congress in 2009.

But it can't stop here. The Asian-American community will continue to grow and become more politically active each year. Republicans have the opportunity to engage citizens like the Taing family and Hung and Thuan Trinh, if we are to truly represent all the people and all the values which make America exceptional.  

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Romney makes his case, gives America a clear choice

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Romney makes his case, gives America a clear choice
Aug 31st 2012, 19:11

Governor Romney's acceptance speech last night wowed the standing-room-only crowd at the Republican Convention. He was introduced by Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, who moved many of us to tears with his tribute to prior generations of selfless Americans. By reminding us of our obligation to our children, Sen. Rubio readied us to hear from Governor Romney on why he should be president and how he would lead.

And Governor Romney made his case, step by step. He began by introducing himself, his family, and his experience in business – not shying away at all from his time at Bain Capital. He came across as exceptionally competent, funny and warm. Most of all, Romney showed why he is qualified to be president. He was supportive of women. He defended business success and challenged President Obama's record and divisive leadership.

He also presented a vision for his presidency, which included five specific objectives. By the end, when Romney was extorting his vision for America, the crowd was standing, cheering so loudly they were drowning out his final words.

Last night, Governor Romney presented a clear choice to the American people: he pitted his competence and relevant experience against the disappointment of a nation who voted for President Obama and felt best about him "on the day he was elected."

After three days of speeches by great governors and other great Americans, Governor Romney capped the proceedings with a clear vision: competent, positive, and decisive leadership that is modeled on successful state governing principles that will finally give Americans the change they have been waiting for.

-

It wasn't only Governor Romney who made a compelling case for Republican governance. A stellar cast of Republican governors and politicians fired up the convention crowd with their stories of governing turnarounds.

On Day 1, keynote speaker Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey electrified the crowd as he described the need for shared sacrifice and how he transformed a traditionally Democratic state through bipartisan budget cutting.

Likewise, Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin was able to describe how he balanced the budget, took on the unions and saved taxpayers one billion dollars by changing how the union-controlled government bought services with no bid contracts. Walker's victory in the recall election that followed proved to the nation that Americans want competent and fiscally prudent governance.

Governor Bob McDonnell of Virginia, who heads the Republican Governors Association, discussed restoring the American Dream, his grandfather's experience immigrating from Ireland, and the economic malaise that is affecting his home state.

And the facts are proving it. By every measure, Republican governors are the GOP launch pad of success. The states headed by Republican governors have an average unemployment rate of 7.84% compared to Democrat-governed states which have average unemployment of 8.77%. How does this happen? Republicans stay firm on their position for a balanced budget, lowering taxes and their insistence on competence.

As the convention progressed I soon realized something rather impressive: Contrary to the myth, Republicans have a high level of diversity. Governors like Susana Martinez from New Mexico, Luis Fortuno from Puerto Rico, Mary Fallin from Oklahoma, and Brian Sandoval from Nevada expose the lie that the GOP is the party of old white men. Of the 29 Republican governors, 25 are white, two are Hispanic, two are Indian American, and four are female.

And two of the greatest speeches of the convention came from women – former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Ann Romney. Now we understand why Secretary Rice was considered as a running mate: Her delivery and content was superb. As for Mrs. Romney, there really is no better advocate for Gov. Romney than his wife.

Mitt Romney vowed to "help you and your family" with more jobs, a better economy, and a stronger environment for businesses to thrive. 

After three days of speeches by great governors and other great Americans, Governor Romney capped the proceedings with a clear vision: competent, positive, and decisive leadership that is modeled on successful state governing principles that will finally give Americans the change they have been waiting for.

Gary Shapiro is president and CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)®, the U.S. trade association representing more than 2,000 consumer electronics companies, and author of the New York Times bestselling book, "The Comeback: How Innovation Will Restore the American Dream" Contact him on Twitter at @GaryShapiro.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: A gold medal for Romney in Tampa

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
A gold medal for Romney in Tampa
Aug 31st 2012, 17:16

Never underestimate your opponent. The guy everyone in the media was sure was "stiff, boring, and unlikeable" just pulled off the upset of the year…of the decade…maybe of the century. Mitt Romney used his experience at staging the Olympics to upstage and out-shine Barack Obama Thursday night in Tampa. To put it bluntly, he pulled off the impossible: Mitt out Obama-ed Obama!

How did Mitt do it? With stories. Mitt learned the most important lesson running the 2002 Winter Olympics in Utah. The lesson is that Olympics aren't about sports. They are about hundreds of compelling stories -- each of them bringing tears to your eyes. Each of them is really about God, faith, family and country. 

The same lesson applies to politics. It isn't about policies. It's about riveting and compelling stories that connect with the American people. And Mitt learned well enough to earn a gold medal on Thursday night.

Mitt "out Obama-ed Obama" with a diversity no GOP convention has ever seen. A diversity that, to be honest let me flabbergasted. 

As a political pundit and observer of politics for decades, I've never seen such an array of star power, let alone this kind of diversity of star power at a GOP event.

The turnaround specialist turned-around his image 180 degrees on Thursday night. There were few dry eyes in the house. You may not agree with all of Mitt's political views, but you've got to now respect the man.

-

We watched a never ending array of storytellers. Fomer Secretary of State Condi Rice,  Governor Susanna Martinez, Senator Marco Rubio, Mayor Mia Long, Governor Nikki Haley, Senator Kelly Ayotte, Olympic heroes, Mitt's friends, neighbors and churchgoers…and then the real Exhibit A definition of star power, Clint Eastwood talking to an empty chair (and an empty suit named Obama). And one story was better than the next.

Mitt "out Obama-ed Obama" by showcasing testimonials to his life as a clergyman -- who knew? We heard testimony to his love and respect for fellow church members -- who knew? We heard testimony to his willingness to help heal the sick, honor the dying, and give eulogies for the dead -- who knew?

In one masterful convention and one miraculous night, Mitt transformed from "evil, greedy Wall Street titan"…to America's favorite husband, father, and…minister? That's one heck of a transformation. 

The man Obama has painted as evil and greedy turns out to be not just a CEO, business dynamo, and hero that saved the Olympics, but a man of God. 

We learned that a $250,000,000 business superstar donated his valuable time to visit sick people in the hospital…to babysit children whose parents were in the hospital…halted his entire business and re-located it to New York to locate a missing daughter of a partner…and honored his wife by telling her that her job as a mother was more difficult and more important than his job as the breadwinner. My head was spinning, my eyes were tearing. -- And I'm a cynical political pundit who thought he'd heard it all.

The turnaround specialist turned-around his image 180 degrees on Thursday night. There were few dry eyes in the house. You may not agree with all of Mitt's political views, but you've got to now respect the man.

Mitt took a GOP convention and turned it into the 2012 Olympics. He didn't bore people with scary, stodgy politicians denigrating Obama, or citing facts and figures that make people's eyes glaze over. He wowed America with stories of God, faith, family, child births, business beginnings, 100,000 balloons, 500 pounds of confetti, one superstar Hollywood legend, and the singing of "America the Beautiful."

Mitt didn't even need fake Roman columns to pull it off. He just used stories. Great American stories from a rainbow of political stars. GOP politician after politician walked to that podium with stories of their grandfathers and grandmothers, parents, kids, business comebacks, their faith in God, and their love of America. This was a religious revival crossed with the Olympics. And it worked.

Who was watching? Everyone. I mean the whole country. I live in Las Vegas. Not exactly a politically obsessed town. I put the GOP Convention on TiVo and went to an early dinner with my kids to our favorite Chinese restaurant. It's a huge place seating about 150 diners. I walked in the door and my mouth dropped open. We were the only ones in the place at 6:30pm. It was a ghost town. On a busy Thursday night. In Las Vegas. It was like Christmas Eve, or Easter eve, or a Super Bowl. We were the only table occupied in a restaurant of 150, for an hour. Sure, it's anecdotal but I swear this is a sign that all of America was glued to their TV sets to hear if Romney is the guy to save this beloved country and this frightening, failing US economy.

The reaction from Middle America? Hundreds of my friends and fans --most are small business owners or entrepreneurs -- texted or emailed me during Romney's speech. They all said the same thing: "Homerun." Well, a few said: "Grand Slam homerun." And more than a few said "Wayne you predicted a Romney landslide defeat over 3 months ago -- your prediction just came true tonight in front of our eyes."

But most importantly was the reaction of my Midwest friends. This election will be decided in the Heartland of America. My Midwest friends -- to a man --admitted to having tears in their eyes. They were blown away. The greedy, rich, Wall Street titan image is gone. Erased in one magical night. In the Midwest they now feel that Romney is one of them. A good man. A humble man. A spiritual man. A patriot. A problem solver.

The Mitt Romney homerun lines according to a large cross section of my friends and fans:

* "We celebrate success in America. We don't apologize for success."
* "When the world needs to do really good stuff, you need an American."
* "There's something wrong with the kind of job he's done as President when the best feeling you had, was the day you voted for him."
* "Obama promised to slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet. My promise: TO HELP YOU AND YOUR FAMILY."

And Marco Rubio's show-stopping lines must get honorable mention:

* "It's not that Obama is a bad person…it's that he's a bad President."
* "Power belongs to the people."
* "Obama is trying ideas that people came to America to get away from."
* "Almighty God is the source of all we have."
* "Faith in our Creator is the most important American value of them all."

This was an Olympic quality event. Romney earned a gold medal. Rubio got the silver. Clint Eastwood got the bronze. The staging was exquisite. The stories were riveting and compelling. And Romney became not just human, but super human in front of America's voters.

Next up...that landslide I predicted.

Wayne Allyn Root is a capitalist evangelist and serial entrepreneur. He is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee. He now serves as chairman of the Libertarian National Campaign Committee. He is the best-selling author of "The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gold & Tax Cuts." For more, visit his website: www.ROOTforAmerica.com.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Mitt Romney delivers in speech on the biggest night of his political life

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Mitt Romney delivers in speech on the biggest night of his political life
Aug 31st 2012, 05:59

On the biggest night of his political life, Mitt Romney delivered.

His address accepting the Republican nomination won't be long-remembered. It was a workmanlike speech. It didn't soar, and wasn't intended to.

After the savaging he's taken from President Obama's re-election campaign, and with the public impression of him still foggy, Romney set out to deliver a simple message: "I'm okay. You can trust me. I can do a job, and I want to put America back to work."

The speech mostly  lacked ideology. If you missed the opening bit where he hailed Paul Ryan, you might not have guessed that he had selected the House budget committee chairman as his running-mate in a choice emphasizing deep philosophical and policy differences with the president.

Instead, the speech ran on biography and can-do optimism. It pleased the crowd in the arena, but was pitched to the TV audience beyond its walls, and especially to voters disappointed with President Obama but not outraged by him.

Much of the first part of the speech was spent explaining Romney's family background, often affectingly. He was clearly moved when he explained how his dad used to leave a rose for his mom on her bedside table, and how she found out something had happened to him the day he died when there was no rose. Romney obviously felt it deeply, too, when he described raising his five boys. He said he and Ann would give anything "to break up just one more fight between the boys, or wake up in the morning and discover a pile of kids asleep in our room."

It would take a heart of stone, or an implacable opposition to Romney, not to be impressed by his sincere devotion to his family.

In another passage, he talked of his work at Bain Capital, casting it as risky endeavor, shot through with uncertainty at the beginning. He mentioned sympathetic companies like Staples and a successful steel concern as its fruits. And he leavened it all with some humor, saying he didn't get the Mormon church to invest with Bain at the outset, worried he might lose its money and "go to hell."

It was the best defense of Bain of the campaign. This discussion gave way to a familiar attack on President Obama for denigrating success. But Romney always spoke of the president's failures more in sorrow than in anger.

"I wish President Obama had succeeded because I want America to succeed," Romney said. He credited him with good intentions: "The President hasn't disappointed you because he wanted to." He invoked the thrill of the president's election and the subsequent letdown: "You know there's something wrong with the kind of job he's done as president when the best feeling you had was the day you voted for him."

He deflated the president rather than excoriated him. In one of the signature lines of the night, he quoted a famous bit of Obama overpromising to sustained laughter: "President Obama promised to begin to slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet." Then, he pointedly contrasted that with his more down-to-Earth goal: "My promise...is to help you and your family."

Romney criticized Obama's policies from the right, but set out a pragmatic mission in very prosaic terms: "What America needs is jobs. Lots of jobs."

His policy agenda was presented only in a sketchy outline. The main thrust of his argument was more thematic: to take the change, hope, and unity that Obama evoked so powerfully in 2008, and leverage them to the end of reversing an Obama agenda that has only brought economic stagnation and political division.

At the end of the night, Romney had done the job he set out to do. After this speech, you might not fervently believe in him, but you might hire him. And that's enough.

Rich Lowry is editor of The National Review and a Fox News contributor.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Thursday, August 30, 2012

FOXNews.com: Romney takes a giant step in the right direction

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Romney takes a giant step in the right direction
Aug 31st 2012, 04:21

Accepting his party's nomination for president Thursday night in Tampa Mitt Romney delivered a solid speech. It succeeded in beginning the process of humanizing the former Massachusetts governor.  It demonstrated his comittment to women and his view of government. It gave us more insight into him personally, into his family and it made him more empathetic.

The high point of the speech came when Romney made it clear that after nearly four years in office President Obama has failed. He explained to America that we are not better off than we were 4 years ago. And his message was delivered in a compelling way.

Romney also succeeded in making it clear that it is all right for Obama voters to swing over to his team this time around. He gave those voters permission to admit that the candidate they chose in 2008 didn't succeed. In other words he told his audience that four years later it's okay to have buyer's remorse.

Another high point came when Romney talked about believing in America and American exceptionalism. That was a theme he hit particulary strongly.

Where Romney wasn't as strong was on the issues: his plan to create energy independence and 12 million new jobs if he becomes the next president was not as strong as the overall thematics in the speech.

There's no doubt that in Tampa Romney took a giant step forward with his speech to the convention. He did not, in my judgment, close the deal. But he has now begun the process of turning around a favorable rating that is currently moribund.  

Clint Eastwood ultimately doesn't matter;  Mitt Romney ultimately does.

Tonight, Mitt Romney took a giant step in the right direction.

Douglas E. Schoen is a political strategist, Fox News contributor, author of the new book, "Hopelessly Divided: The New Crisis in American Politics and What it Means for 2012 and Beyond" (Rowman and Littlefield). Follow Doug on Twitter @DouglasESchoen.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Why Condoleezza Rice is a historic, transformational figure

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Why Condoleezza Rice is a historic, transformational figure
Aug 30th 2012, 19:58

Very rarely in the life of a nation or a culture, a person appears who represents a true healer—from a psychological perspective—of divisions and fault lines, whether of race or gender or ethnicity or socioeconomic status, that occur naturally as the story of that nation or culture takes form.

Such a healer must acknowledge the past shortcomings and injuries and challenges and victories inherent in the collective story, put it in context, and, by his or her own understanding of them and embodiment of them, make them part of a cohesive and good whole, so that the story is seen always to have had an internal axis around which it turned, a sense of ultimate integrity and a quality of manifest destiny.

In Swedish, the word for such a person or event or influential book is, kulturbärer—translated as culture-bearer.  Author Robert Pirsig described the kulturbärer as something or someone who "bears the culture on its back" and carries it to a different place.

Condoleezza Rice, with her speech last night at the Republican National Convention, qualified herself as such a person.  Her intelligence is so obvious, and her grasp of the core truths of the American narrative so apparent, that those things alone could be mistaken for the reasons she galvanized the nation last night.

But, from a psychological perspective, there are other reasons.  Ms. Rice literally transcends all boundaries of race, gender and socioeconomic status.  She is feminine, but strong.  She is approachable and warm, yet possessed of an iron will.  

She comes from humble beginnings, which she honors, yet has attained success no one would deny her.  She is a black American who seems to bear no ill-will toward white Americans.  She is a former Democrat turned Republican.  She is not old and not young.  

Very few people who listened to her on Wednesday night would posit that she harbors hatred toward anyone or any group.  All of these characteristics in one individual do not merely constitute a candidate, but an event.  A psychological, healing kulturbärer.

To be clearer:  Whatever vestiges of racial, gender and religious prejudice or self-doubt reside in the American people or our national character, Condoleezza Rice could literally help remove them, by her presence on the national stage, perhaps as part of the Romney administration or, perhaps, eight years from now, by her presence in her own administration.  And she can do so without abandoning our national character (as President Obama has done), but, rather, by stating it more clearly than ever, while being evidence of the best of it herself.

Last night speech by Condoleezza Rice was a historic moment.  In years to come, that will be clearer.  But last night, I knew it, and, a third of the way through the speech, I brought my daughter down from her bedroom to watch it with me.  She is fourteen-years-old and she will struggle, as we all must, to find the best in herself.  And I wanted her to watch Ms. Rice as part of that journey.  I couldn't even put into words exactly why it seemed so important to me, when she asked me.  Now, I have.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team. Dr. Ablow can be reached at info@keithablow.com.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: What your favorite steak says about you

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
What your favorite steak says about you
Aug 30th 2012, 16:00

Omaha Steaks has been my family's company for nearly a century. While we are technically in the meat industry, we also are in the business of delivering exceptional dining experiences to our family of customers. Over the years, we have learned that one steak does not fit all. We began to notice that different personality types seem to favor different steaks.

That observation prompted the Omaha Steaks Product Development Team to conduct an informal survey of Omaha Steaks customers to determine if there truly was a genuine correlation between the personality traits of individual consumers and the type of steak they prefer. Our survey findings validated our observation that individual preferences in steaks are directly linked to a well-defined group of common personality characteristics. Here are the team's findings:
 


Filet Mignons are mild mannered, tender hearted, meticulous and enjoy simple elegance. Attributes of a filet mignon, the tenderest of all steaks, include a mild flavor and aroma.

Ribeyes are even-tempered, strive for balance in life and have laid back attitudes with a bit of a maverick spirit. Attributes of a ribeye steak include a balanced rich, juicy flavor that is tender, yet firm in texture.

Strip Loins (New York Strips) are passionate and somewhat indulgent, with strong personalities and take charge attitudes. Attributes of a strip loin steak include a rich beefy flavor and a firm texture.

Top Sirloins are mainstream with a down to earth philosophy on life and a "what you see is what you get" attitude. Attributes of a top sirloin steak are a beefy flavor that is naturally lean.

T-Bones have strong convictions and prefer the outdoors and the wilderness, although they are also known to possess a somewhat sensitive side. Attributes of a T-bone steak include the beefy taste of a strip loin combined with the tender flavor of a filet mignon.

Since we released our survey results, countless people have shared with me that our findings are "spot on" in terms of their preferences. This data also has enabled us to make better recommendations to those who want to buy steaks for family and friends and are somewhat unsure about which steak to choose.

Whatever steak is your preference, it's important that you prepare it well for full enjoyment. Grilling great steaks is easy if you follow some simple rules. Here are Omaha Steaks top 5 tips for perfect grilling:

1. Clean and pre-heat your grill on high.

2. Lightly oil and season everything before you put it on the grill. This helps the searing process and prevents sticking.

3. Sear the outside of the steaks when grilling, using tongs or a spatula to turn the meat, and cover the grill as much as possible during the grilling process to help lock in the great flavor and to prevent flare-ups. Never pierce the steak when grilling as that allows the flavorful juices to escape. Don't press or squish the steaks or burgers when grilling either. Just let them be!

4. Use the 60/40 grilling method. Grill for 60% of the time on the first side, then grill 40% of the time after you turn over the food. This will give you an evenly cooked product.

5. Place your cooked meats on a clean plate and allow your foods to "rest" for two to five minutes before serving to retain moisture and juiciness.

Most steaks don't take very long to cook on the grill, so be careful to avoid overcooking. Using a timer like the one in Omaha Steaks' free iPhone app, Steaktime, can be a great help, too. With the Steaktime app timer, the user can create a personalized steak timer setting for each guest, ensuring that everyone's steak is grilled to perfection and ready to serve simultaneously.

Whatever steak is your favorite, just grill it according to your personal preference and enjoy it with your family and friends, while you talk about how you always knew your dad was a rib-eye lovin' maverick.  

Todd Simon is the fifth-generation family owner of Omaha Steaks.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Media declares open season on Mitt Romney's Mormon faith

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Media declares open season on Mitt Romney's Mormon faith
Aug 30th 2012, 14:04

Several weeks ago, David Axelrod, the Obama campaign's maharishi, called together his Chicago gang to discuss what they should do if their mudslinging campaign against Mitt Romney and Bain Capital didn't do the trick and Romney began to pull even with—or ahead of—Barack Obama in the polls.

According to my sources inside the campaign, Axelrod & Co. discussed what might be called the nuclear option: unleashing an attack on Romney's Mormon faith via the mainstream media.
As Axelrod knew, many pundits credit evangelical Christians, who are heavily Republican and comprise some 14 percent of voters, with putting George W. Bush over the top in the election of 2004.Axelrod was also aware that Mormonism is a fraught subject among evangelical Christians, a substantial portion of whom believe that Mormonism is a cult that is separate and apart from Christianity.

Is this sudden, strange and unaccountable focus on Mitt Romney's Mormonism by the mainstream media just an odd coincidence? Or is the "fine Italian hand" of David Axelrod behind the media onslaught?

-

Axelrod calculated that if he could turn 5 to 10 percent of the evangelicals against Romney because of his Mormonism, he could deny Romney victory at the polls in 2012.

Of course, Axelrod and his team had already succeeded in pandering to special interest groups, such as Hispanics, gays, and women. They wondered whether they could have equal success playing on the fears of Mormonism among evangelical Christians and convince them to stay at home on Election Day rather than vote for Mitt Romney.

Axelrod recognized that playing the Mormon card contained several obvious dangers. For one thing, the Obama campaign was already embroiled in a bitter dispute with the Catholic Church over a health-insurance mandate for contraception. An attack on Mormonism would open the Obamaites to fresh charges of religious bigotry. For another, an attack on Romney's religious beliefs might encourage the Republicans to reciprocate by reopening the whole tangled issue of Obama and the Reverend Wright.

During an interview I conducted with the Reverend Wright for my book "The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House," I asked the pastor if he had converted Obama from Islam to Christianity. "That's hard to say," Wright replied.

Wright then went on to say: "I think I convinced [Obama] that it was okay for him to make a choice in terms of who he believed Jesus is. And I told him it was really okay and not a putdown of the Muslim part of his family or his Muslim friends…. And even after Barack and Michelle came to the church, their kids weren't raised in the church like you raise other kids in Sunday school. No. Church was not their thing. It never was their thing… So the church was not an integral part of their spiritual lives after they got married."

According to my sources, Axelrod at first hesitated to green light an attack on Romney's Mormonism for fear it might boomerang and expose the campaign as clumsy and further tarnish Obama as a blundering amateur. However, a new set of polls convinced Axelrod that he had no choice but to go for the nuclear option and raise the issue of Romney's Mormonism.

These recent polls show Romney beginning to close the gap in seven key swing states—Wisconsin, Florida, Colorado, Nevada, Ohio, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. What's more, according to an election model based on state-level economic data from the last eight presidential elections and put together by Colorado political science professors Kenneth Bickers and Michael Berry, "Romney will win the popular vote and take the White House with more than 300 electoral votes."

In case you haven't noticed, the media has recently declared open season on Mitt Romney's Mormon faith. Here are some of the most egregious examples:

• GQ, a men's magazine of style and culture, printed a blistering piece about Romney's Mormonism in its August issue. In one particularly repellent sentence, the writer noted that Mormon founder Joseph Smith, "despite having some forty wives, still endeavored to f*** everything in sight."

• MSNBC anchor Lawrence O'Donnell went on one of his vein-popping tirades about Mormonism, charging that the religion was "created by a guy in upstate New York in 1830 when he got caught having sex with the maid and explained to his wife that God told him to do it."

• The New York Times Sunday Review section ran an article titled "Why Race Is Still a Problem for Mormons." The caption accompanying the article said: "Brigham Young, who established the Mormon Temple in Salt Lake City and whose statue stands beside it, relegated blacks to second-class status in the church."

• ABC "World News Tonight" ran a two-part series on Romney's Mormonism. This is the same newscast that in 2008 refused to broadcast videotapes obtained by Brian Ross, the network's chief investigative reporter, showing the Reverend Jeremiah Wright ranting against whites and Jews. Now, with two months remaining in the 2012 campaign, an ABC News reporter hammered home the theme that in the church's "imposing temples, secret rituals are performed by all-male leaders."

• NBC, which never felt an obligation to examine Barack Obama's relationship with the Reverend Wright's brand of black liberation theology, devoted a full one-hour episode of "Rock Center with Brian Williams" to examining Romney's Mormonism.

Is this sudden, strange and unaccountable focus on Mitt Romney's Mormonism by the mainstream media just an odd coincidence? Or is the "fine Italian hand" of David Axelrod behind the media onslaught?

In trying to answer that question, I am reminded of what NBC political analyst Mark Halperin recently said in another context: "The media is very susceptible to doing what the Obama campaign wants."

Edward Klein is the former editor in chief of The New York Times Magazine. His latest book is "The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House." (Regnery 2012)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Why you'll never hear about the war on drugs at the political conventions

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Why you'll never hear about the war on drugs at the political conventions
Aug 30th 2012, 12:00

Forty years ago, the United States locked up fewer than 200 of every 100,000 Americans. Then President Nixon declared war on drugs. Now we lock up more of our people than any other country -- more even than the authoritarian regimes in Russia and China.

A war on drugs -- on people, that is -- is unworthy of a country that claims to be free.

Unfortunately, this outrage probably won't be discussed in Tampa or Charlotte.

The media (including Fox News) run frightening stories about Mexican cocaine cartels and marijuana gangs. Few of my colleagues stop to think that this is a consequence of the war and that decriminalization would end the violence. There are no wine "cartels" or beer "gangs." No one "smuggles" liquor. Liquor dealers are called "businesses," not gangs, and they "ship" products instead of "smuggling" them. They settle disputes with lawyers rather than with guns.

Everything can be abused, but that doesn't mean government can stop it. Government runs amok when it tries to protect us from ourselves.

"Our discomfort with the idea of heroin available at drugstores is similar to that of a Prohibitionist shuddering at the thought of bourbon at the corner store. We'll get over it."

- John McWhorter

Drug-related crime occurs because the drugs are available only through the artificially expensive black market. Drug users steal not because drugs drive them to steal. Our government says heroin and nicotine are similarly addictive, but no one robs convenience stores to get Marlboros. (That could change with confiscatory tobacco taxes.)

Are defenders of the drug war aware of the consequences? I don't think so.

John McWhorter, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, indicts the drug war for "destroying black America." McWhorter, by the way, is black.

McWhorter sees prohibition as the saboteur of black families. "Enduring prison time is seen as a badge of strength. It's regarded (with some justification) as an unjust punishment for selling people something they want. The ex-con is a hero rather than someone who went the wrong way."

He enumerates the positive results from ending prohibition. "No more gang wars over turf, no more kids shooting each other. ... Men get jobs, as they did in the old days, even in the worst ghettos, because they have to."

Would cheaper and freely available drugs bring their own catastrophe? "Our discomfort with the idea of heroin available at drugstores is similar to that of a Prohibitionist shuddering at the thought of bourbon at the corner store. We'll get over it."

The media tell us that some drugs are so powerful that one "hit" or "snort" will hook the user forever. But the government's own statistics disprove that. The National Institutes of Health found that 36 million Americans have tried crack. But only 12 percent have used it in the previous year, and fewer than six percent have used it in the previous month. If crack is so addictive, how did 88 percent of the users quit?

If drugs were legal, I suppose that at first more people would try them. But most would give them up. Eventually, drug use would diminish, as it has in Portugal, which decriminalized all drugs, and the Netherlands, which allows legal marijuana. More young men would find real jobs; police could focus on real crime.

As I write in "No, They Can't: Why Government Fails -- but Individuals Succeed" when the public is this divided about an issue, it's best left to voluntary social pressure instead of legal enforcement. That's how most Americans decide whether to drink alcohol or go to church every week. Private voluntary social networks have their own ways of punishing bad behavior and send more nuanced messages about what's unacceptable. Government's one-size-fits-all rules don't improve on that.

"Once the principle is admitted that it is the duty of the government to protect the individual against his own foolishness," economist Ludwig von Mises wrote, "why not prevent him from reading bad books and bad plays?... The mischief done by bad ideologies is more pernicious ... than that done by narcotic drugs."

If we as adults own our own bodies, we ought to get to control what we put in them. It's legitimate for government to protect me from reckless drivers and drunken airline pilots -- but not to protect me from myself.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of  "No, They Can't: Why Government Fails-But Individuals Succeed," "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his website at johnstossel.com.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Obama's failed Iran policy on full display as UN Secretary General visits Tehran

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Obama's failed Iran policy on full display as UN Secretary General visits Tehran
Aug 29th 2012, 12:15

The visit of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to Iran this week, as the country chairs a meeting of the so-called 120 member Non-Aligned Movement, says as much about the failure of President Obama's Iran policy as it does about the UN's abject lack of a moral compass. 

The Obama administration was instrumental in supporting Ban Ki-moon's bid for a second term, fought back congressional attempts to subject American UN funding to greater controls, and has run its foreign policy through UN institutions from the outset.  But when President Obama asked the SG not to go to Iran during an election cycle that spotlights Obama's alleged ability to isolate the regime, he turned him down flat.  

The line of world leaders who don't take this American president seriously just got longer.

The UN has a hard time confronting Iran for many reasons.  For starters, Iran is a UN authority figure.  Currently, Iran is a Vice-President of the UN General Assembly.  Though it stones women to death for alleged adultery, and recently banned them from 80 fields of university study, Iran is a member of the UN Commission on the Status of Women.  A master at arbitrary and unlawful killings, as well as torture, Iran is on the UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice.  Infamous for an absence of freedom of speech and of the press, Iran is the Rapporteur of the UN Committee on Information.

The line of world leaders who don't take this American president seriously just got longer.

-

Iran is also the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism.  But the UN still has no definition of terrorism because all if its Islamic members have signed on to the Islamic Terrorism Convention which says blowing up selected women and children doesn't count.

Evidently, therefore, Ban Ki-moon felt the UN and Iran still have lots in common.

Also not holding the Secretary-General back was Iran's systematic refusal to admit other UN officials, namely those specifically charged with investigating its human rights abuses.  As recently as July, Iran refused to cooperate with the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran or allow him into the country.  Also being refused entry after numerous requests are the UN Special Rapporteurs on torture, the independence of judges and lawyers, freedom of opinion and expression, summary or arbitrary executions, involuntary disappearances, freedom of religion or belief, and minorities.  Obviously, the Secretary-General's outing will permit Iran to tout his anodyne presence as an acceptable substitute.

Back in 2007 then UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour made a similar mistake of attending a Tehran event of the Non-Aligned Movement.  Following Arbour's appearance, Iranian officials crowed that the UN had "taken part in the conference at the highest level" – and executed 21 people the day after she left.

Today, Iran's genocidal sights are in plain view – with yet another call by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to "finish off" "the Zionist cancerous tumor" less than two weeks ago.  Even the UN's own slothful International Atomic Energy Agency threw up its hands on August 24 during its efforts to investigate Iran's nuclear program and its military dimensions, and announced "important differences remain between Iran and the Agency…we have no plans for a follow-up meeting."  But why would Iran bother with the IAEA when the Secretary-General is coming to town?

President Obama has spent his first term in office watching the world's most dangerous state make a dash for the world's most dangerous weapon, and waiting for the UN Security Council, General Assembly, and Human Rights Council to get serious about the isolation and sanction of Iran.  Ban Ki-moon's Tehran sojourn legitimizes this rogue regime.  President Obama's foreign policy legitimizes the UN.  It's a toxic mix.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Rice leads triple-punch of heavy hitters in Tampa triumph

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Rice leads triple-punch of heavy hitters in Tampa triumph
Aug 30th 2012, 09:39

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice led off a crucial triple-punch combination that transfixed the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida on Wednesday night.

Hurricane Isaac thankfully hit the Sunshine State with a pale echo of Category Five Katrina seven years ago (I was in Fort Lauderdale then and watched it loom). But Rice, followed by new Mexico Gov. Sandra Martinez and Vice President Paul Ryan, unleashed a Category Five hurricane of rhetoric on the flailing Obama re-election campaign.

Rice has always been a highly effective public speaker, but in 12 years of covering her appearances I have never heard her to more effect than on Wednesday night. 

She has always preferred the roles of diplomat, public intellectual and academic to running for office herself. But her speech was of huge importance in lighting up the RNC on its second day.

With her old colleague and friend Robert Zoellick now in the key role of being Gov. Mitt Romney's top foreign policy advisor and coordinator, Rice's triumph revives the prospect that if Romney wins in November, he may pick her for secretary of defense or for a second tour as secretary of state. 

If the latter, Rice would be only the second person (the first was Daniel Webster) ever to serve in the role twice. The forgotten David Newsom technically served as secretary of state twice for Jimmy Carter in 1980, but as he only did so for two terms of a single day each, he doesn't really count (except for to the nitpickers).

Rice spoke at a crucial moment in the convention. The planned first day on Monday was cancelled due to fears about the potential impact of Isaac and Gov. Chris Christie's kickoff off the major speakers on Tuesday was definitely perceived as under-powered and lukewarm in his enthusiasm for candidate Romney.

The nominee's wife Ann delivered the goods in her own speech, and confirmed what everybody knew already – that she will make a confident, stylish and highly effective First Lady. But the only news or surprise would have been had she bungled that presentation. The truncated convention badly needed a supercharged jump-start – and Rice provided it.

Romney and his planners showed their acumen by not only by showcasing Rice in prime time, but by following up on her at once with a breakthrough speech by New Mexico Gov. Sandra Martinez.

In these columns I have repeatedly urged Martinez as a possible vice presidential pick. Paul Ryan is proving a red hot winner in that role for Romney, confirming his political judgment. 

But Martinez spoke so powerfully, so affectingly and so well that she clearly established herself as a political leader of natural stature. She now has to be a frontrunner for the post of homeland security secretary in the first Romney administration. Furthermore, from now on she must certainly be a a leading contender for the running mate slot on any future GOP ticket, especially one led eight years from now by Paul Ryan.

Ryan could easily have been overshadowed by the effectiveness of his warm-up speakers: He wasn't. A seasoned figure on the national stage after seven terms in Congress and his effective leadership in the House on financial issues, his speech was a model of what a young, vigorous running mate should be. Sarah Palin proved equally powerful in her congressional appearance

But it was not just what Rice, Martinez and Ryan said that as so effective in Tampa, but who and what they were. Public television carried four hours of the proceedings to its audience of both established liberals and floating independents, and in doing so, it inadvertently blew apart the Obama campaign's strategy, enthusiastically embraced by MSNBC , of presenting the Republican convention and presidential campaign as the sole property of tired old, rich, white males.

Rice was only the second woman and second African-American in history to serve as secretary of state, and though looking far too young for it, reminded her audience that as a little girl she wasn't even allowed to go to whites-only movies and diners in her native Little Rock, Arkansas. 

Her great career remains a magnificent testimony to the vitality and power of the American dream. Two African-Americans have now served full and effective terms as respected secretaries of state – Rice and the great Gen. Colin Powell. The Democrats have still to appoint their first.

Martinez is the first-ever Hispanic-American woman to become a state governor. When her parents launched their own security guard business, she recalled how she was pressed into service carrying a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum, a gun, she said, that felt like it weighed more than she did.

Ryan too came from the other end of society from Gov. Romney, working-class Irish Catholic with a widowed mother. 

I covered the emergence of Barack Obama on the national scene with his first class speech to the Democratic National Convention in Boston in 2004, and I made a fool of myself among established pundits when I got back to Washington by saying that I had just heard a likely future president of the United States (I thought he would win in 2012 or 2016, not dreaming how catastrophically inept Hillary Clinton's $250 million campaign would turn out to be in 2008.)

I heard that same sudden explosion of brilliant political talent onto the national stage in Tampa on Wednesday night. Give Mitt Romney two terms of peace and economic recovery as president, and Paul Ryan will repeat George Herbert Walker Bush's 1988 achievement and succeed him in a walk. The man is a natural.

The triple-punch triumph of Rice (who still looks like she's only in her 20s and 30s), Martinez and Ryan and their coverage on PBS nationwide (Don't scrap it if you win, Mitt, it will have helped elect you), also now looks likely to blow apart the Conventional Wisdom of the Great Pundits that President Obama holds an unassailable lead over Romney among women, Hispanics and young voters in the 18-to-29 age group. 

As the still-only 42-year-old Ryan noted, young voters do not want to remain in a perpetual state of unemployment, living in forever in their parent's house with only a fading Obama poster on the wall to keep them company, and to remind them of false hopes offered but never delivered (a devastating image worthy of a Franklin Roosevelt or a Ronald Reagan). 

If the economy does not recover significantly in the next less than 70 days (and who imagines that it can?), that image may raise a tsunami of young voters to propel Romney-Ryan into the White House.

The Rice-Martinez-Ryan triple punch speeches at Tampa gave Mitt Romney another tremendous boost – he will come to his acceptance speech already riding high from proof that the managerial, chairman of board competence he so proved in business has already transferred to his direction of a national presidential campaign. As is rightly repeated ad nauseam, one of the most important tests any chief executive in any business faces is the selection of the best subordinates for crucial roles. 

We still have to see how any Romney administration will work out, but the choice of Rice and then Martinez to prepare the way for Ryan, and the choice of Ryan itself, were tactical masterstrokes that could transform the strategic dynamics of the campaign.

Women, Hispanics and younger voters, most of all the younger voters, are now in play. Obama now faces the threat of a nationwide surge in the last month of the campaign against his bankrupt economic policies on the same scale that buried Jimmy Carter against Ronald Reagan in 1980.

Remember – you heard it here first. 

Martin Sieff is the author of "That Should Still Be Us: How Thomas Friedman's Flat World Myths Are Keeping Us Flat on Our Backs."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.